For example I won't travel with my heavy 70-200 f2.8+ftz or I won't take portrait with an Z 24-200 f4-6.3. If you know what I mean. (My english is a little bit limited) For your poll, I still voted 70-300 f4.5-5.6. It seems a better compromise in terms of Price/IQ/Weight against the 70-200 f4 even if it seems ideal to have an f4 trinity with Z
Discuss in the Third Party Lens Talk forum. The Sigma 70-200 F2.8 DG OS HSM | Sport is a fast telezoom for full-frame Canon, Nikon and Sigma bodies. It has 22 elements, including one 'SLD' and nine 'FLD'. It has an 11-blade aperture, minimum focusing distance of 1.2m and a max magnification of 0.21x. The lens weights over 1800g (almost 4lbs
Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Handling and Features. There is no escaping the fact that any 70-200mm f/2.8 full-frame lens is going to be fairly hefty, but the new Nikkor weighs in at a
Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm F2.8 VR S Weight: 3: Zoom Ratio: 2.9 x: Nikon Z 6 II + TC-2x, 230mm, f/5.6, 1/250-second, ISO 200. Autofocus is available as well. Response is speedy, with elementsVCGOs.